Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jun 10, 2014 18:12:26 GMT
Alright everyone! Here is the final draft of the Revised Forum Rules. We'll give them a couple weeks to be discussed before any changes are implemented permanently. Please read through them, and if you have any additions/adjustments/arguments, please post your comments in this thread as outlined below.
However, THINK before you argue against a rule. You'll notice that each option to amend the rules requires Reasoning and How it would benefit the forum. As stated by Re upon TW's founding and reworded in this draft, this place was meant to be a mature forum for meaningful discussion of Otherkin and Therianthropy, building a community in the process. Hanging out with other Therians/Otherkin is secondary. Don't bother arguing against a rule because it stops you from "Having fun". Everyone enjoys some relaxation, a good laugh now and then, and most silliness is usually overlooked and permitted for that reason. The rules here have all been formed, every one, because someone, at some point, has done them to the extreme and misused the forum. As with all rules in every place, it only takes one person being immature for everyone to have to deal with a new rule to prevent it.
That said, if you have a valid argument and present your case/reasoning clearly, we'll take it into consideration and the Admin will have the final say. If you start ranting and throw a fit because there's a rule that stops you from doing something, your argument will be ignored and depending on the severity of your tantrum, you may be warned. Additions:
Modifications:
Removal:
|
|
Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jun 10, 2014 18:18:31 GMT
|
|
Seraphyna
- Therian - Standard Animal
Standard Animal Lion and Reef Shark
Resident Shlion
Posts: 2,085
|
Post by Seraphyna on Jun 10, 2014 18:48:33 GMT
We have a similar policy on OKC. That being said, I think that sharing other members' posts should not be punishable if the forum's name and member(s)' name(s) are left off of it. If you ask me, there's a difference between quoting something maintaining anonymity to discuss it, etc. and posting with full disclosure, effectively 'shaming' the person or similar. I think this rule, as written, is a little bit of trying to control people's behaviors off forum, which, in my opinion, isn't okay either. I'd suggest to amend the above to only include posts that contain the forum and/or member(s) name(s). It's always rubbed me the wrong way when forums have tried to police members off site.
I entirely agree with banning the topics of drugs, violence/racism, banned members, but I would say that the topic of self harm/suicide should not be *banned*, but certainly granted the 'delicate topic' label and people posting things involving those topics should have to include a label like *potential trigger talk of self harm* in the title so that people can avoid triggering topics, but so that people who want support, advice, information, etc. can post it like Kharu did asking about their friend. We obviously aren't qualified to give medical or professional psychological advice, but support we can certain offer.
|
|
Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jun 10, 2014 19:15:34 GMT
... I think that sharing other members' posts should not be punishable if the forum's name and member(s)' name(s) are left off of it. If you ask me, there's a difference between quoting something maintaining anonymity to discuss it, etc. and posting with full disclosure, effectively 'shaming' the person or similar. I think this rule, as written, is a little bit of trying to control people's behaviors off forum, which, in my opinion, isn't okay either. I'd suggest to amend the above to only include posts that contain the forum and/or member(s) name(s). It's always rubbed me the wrong way when forums have tried to police members off site... ...I entirely agree with banning the topics of drugs, violence/racism, banned members, but I would say that the topic of self harm/suicide should not be *banned*, but certainly granted the 'delicate topic' label and people posting things involving those topics should have to include a label like *potential trigger talk of self harm* in the title so that people can avoid triggering topics, but so that people who want support, advice, information, etc. can post it like Kharu did asking about their friend. We obviously aren't qualified to give medical or professional psychological advice, but support we can certain offer... Agreed on both counts. The Content Ownership section was largely left as it was originally, but it can be revised. Either anonymity or Quote and Credit to the original statement are a must regardless.
As for the issue of help with delicate topics, the major stumbling block we've come to is where to draw the line. At what point does offering someone help because they're depressed or claiming intent to harm themselves become delaying treatment or feeding their need for attention and merely prolonging the problem? I'm all for helping people, but we need a clear line of when it's gone to far, and the individual is merely using the forum as a source of pity. Defining that line is the hard part. :\
|
|
Seraphyna
- Therian - Standard Animal
Standard Animal Lion and Reef Shark
Resident Shlion
Posts: 2,085
|
Post by Seraphyna on Jun 10, 2014 21:02:53 GMT
@haru: That's something that would have to be case by case where staff would have to lock or remove threads that get to that point where people need 'real world' help.
|
|
Werecat
- Otherkin - Anthropomorph
Feline
Posts: 228
|
Post by Werecat on Jun 10, 2014 21:38:43 GMT
I would suggest eliminating or heavily revising the Basic Terms & Definitions (For further assistance, check the "Common Misconceptions, and FAQ") section, as some of that information is either incorrect, or is run through someone's personal bias filter that might not reflect the community’s view as a whole; or the factual definitions of the terms themselves.
For example: Therianthopy. Here's what this site says:
”1 - What is Therianthropy? ‘Therianthropy’ is the term used by people who believe they have the soul or mentality of an animal. More commonly, an animal that exists (or is now extinct) on Earth. Therianthropes are a type of Otherkin, but because we can study Earthly animals it is treated as separate from Otherkin.”
Here's what credible and published sites say:
Oxford Unabridged Dictonary: “adjective (Especially of a deity) combining the form of an animal with that of a man.”
Wikipedia: “Therianthropy is the mythological ability of humans to metamorphose into animals through shapeshifting.”
Websters Dictionary: “A human who transforms into an animal. (1885) ”
As we can see, the "official site" definition was clearly run through someone's filter which specifically eliminated all real-world terminology. Nowhere in the official descriptions does it say anything about “people who believe they have the soul or mentality of an animal”, because that’s not what Therianthropy is about. Therianthropy is exactly about a change. We can add on the mental or spiritual component, but only if there is a change from human into animal with that as well. Simply wanting an animal spirit guide or thinking you have an animal soul without any change is not Therianthropy, as that’s more along the lines of Animism or Reverse Anthropomorphism.
If we are all serious about revising the site and getting back in tip-top shape, it's critically important to actually have the correct terminology. Because if not, it can be confusing for newcomers who want to learn more, and it can look like we're don't know what we are talking about when we don't even have the dictionary definition of a term that graces the title of our board.
Just my two cents.
|
|
Seraphyna
- Therian - Standard Animal
Standard Animal Lion and Reef Shark
Resident Shlion
Posts: 2,085
|
Post by Seraphyna on Jun 10, 2014 21:50:19 GMT
Werecat: The 'real world' definition of therianthropy is *not* what is meant in the otherkin community. In an otherkin sense, therians are people who identify as earthly animals either living or extinct in some integral way. People *do not* mean the dictionary definition, which is anthropological in nature.
|
|
Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jun 10, 2014 22:11:58 GMT
I would suggest eliminating or heavily revising the Basic Terms & Definitions (For further assistance, check the "Common Misconceptions, and FAQ") section, as some of that information is either incorrect, or is run through someone's personal bias filter that might not reflect the community’s view as a whole; or the factual definitions of the terms themselves. For example: Therianthopy. Here's what this site says: ”1 - What is Therianthropy? ‘Therianthropy’ is the term used by people who believe they have the soul or mentality of an animal. More commonly, an animal that exists (or is now extinct) on Earth. Therianthropes are a type of Otherkin, but because we can study Earthly animals it is treated as separate from Otherkin.” Here's what credible and published sites say: Oxford Unabridged Dictonary: “adjective (Especially of a deity) combining the form of an animal with that of a man.”Wikipedia: “Therianthropy is the mythological ability of humans to metamorphose into animals through shapeshifting.”Websters Dictionary: “A human who transforms into an animal. (1885) ”As we can see, the "official site" definition was clearly run through someone's filter which specifically eliminated all real-world terminology. Nowhere in the official descriptions does it say anything about “people who believe they have the soul or mentality of an animal”, because that’s not what Therianthropy is about. Therianthropy is exactly about a change. We can add on the mental or spiritual component, but only if there is a change from human into animal with that as well. Simply wanting an animal spirit guide or thinking you have an animal soul without any change is not Therianthropy, as that’s more along the lines of Animism or Reverse Anthropomorphism. If we are all serious about revising the site and getting back in tip-top shape, it's critically important to actually have the correct terminology. Because if not, it can be confusing for newcomers who want to learn more, and it can look like we're don't know what we are talking about when we don't even have the dictionary definition of a term that graces the title of our board. Just my two cents. The main resource I used for a more 'credible' reference was Reference.com, one of Dictionary.com's sub-sites. It's definitions of Therianthropy are here, and yes, there are many.
As you may be aware, as society and language use evolve side-by-side, the meanings of words change to fit the ideologies of their time. Etymology is just that, "the study of the origin of words and the way in which their meanings have changed throughout history." As it is used here and in nearly every other site regarding Otherkin and animal-identity concepts, that's how we're using it.
Technically "Therian" refers to animal-headed, part man part beast, and a group of mammals. The Theta-Delta symbol in no way symbolizes spiritual identity with animals or creatures, and at one point was even used to brand criminals. Just like the swastika was once a holy symbol. These things change with the times, as change is nature. We either adapt and change with it, or we're left behind.
|
|
Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jun 13, 2014 0:34:42 GMT
Below are a few topics brought up in the Chat regarding the new rules draft. I'm posing them here for record and for anyone else' input on them.
|
|
Kasumi Noxumbra
- Otherkin - Animal Mix
Mythical Beast Spectral Draconic Wolf Hybrid
Just don't know what to do........every effort almost feels wasted
Posts: 2,441
|
Post by Kasumi Noxumbra on Jun 13, 2014 2:01:31 GMT
I really don't know exactly where this should fit in, but something about the member journals and not replying to them if they are not your own journal(s). I've noticed and had to remove several member replies to others journal(s). I completely forgot about that when I was going over these rules with the other moderators. n_n;;
|
|
Kasumi Noxumbra
- Otherkin - Animal Mix
Mythical Beast Spectral Draconic Wolf Hybrid
Just don't know what to do........every effort almost feels wasted
Posts: 2,441
|
Post by Kasumi Noxumbra on Jun 19, 2014 15:00:42 GMT
Also another thing that I think we need to address that has never been in the rules, but I know has been enforced before, is the rule about having multiple accounts using the same IP address and E-mail address. I've seen several times where a member has created an account and then created a second or more, and we've taken action against this by either having them choose which account they wish to use or deleting and banning the IP/E-mail address from the site if we receive no reply from the member creating the multiple accounts.
So really I'm wondering how we're going to deal with these and how the rule would be. I'm mostly drawing a blank this morning about how to word things. Me and mental shifting don't work so well together when I've not slept well. n_n;; Anyways, just thought I should through that out there since I remembered. lol
|
|
Seraphyna
- Therian - Standard Animal
Standard Animal Lion and Reef Shark
Resident Shlion
Posts: 2,085
|
Post by Seraphyna on Jun 19, 2014 22:16:19 GMT
On most forums, the rule is 'one account per physical body' which is enforced as 'one account per IP address/email'.
|
|
Doppel
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Bronze Dragon
Posts: 869
|
Post by Doppel on Jun 25, 2014 1:56:30 GMT
@kasumi SeraphynaI would like to make the "one account per physical body" rule as well when it comes to multiple systems and multiple accounts. HOWEVER, I would also like to add some flexibility to this rule. I had a multiple system contact me in private explaining they want a headmate to have their own account. After a short discussion and deliberation, I approved it and attached a note to the second account explaining why as I deemed their explanation reasonable.
|
|
Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jun 25, 2014 2:29:17 GMT
On an unrelated note: I'll have to add in there that all conduct/posting rules do apply to Private Messages as well. While only the people involved can read them, should one party break rules in the PM, and any of the others bring it to a Moderator's attention, the PM will be treated as any other post and the member breaking rules in it will face the same consequences.
|
|
Kasumi Noxumbra
- Otherkin - Animal Mix
Mythical Beast Spectral Draconic Wolf Hybrid
Just don't know what to do........every effort almost feels wasted
Posts: 2,441
|
Post by Kasumi Noxumbra on Jun 28, 2014 23:32:22 GMT
Doppel
I'm not asking for the member's name or anything like that, but I would like to understand what made it reasonable for a multiple system to be allowed multiple accounts. n_n So if it's not too personal or anything of the sort, would you mind explaining what made you make the exception? Like I said, I don't need to know the member's name so they can remain anonymous.
|
|
Kasumi Noxumbra
- Otherkin - Animal Mix
Mythical Beast Spectral Draconic Wolf Hybrid
Just don't know what to do........every effort almost feels wasted
Posts: 2,441
|
Post by Kasumi Noxumbra on Jul 12, 2014 14:36:42 GMT
Just giving everyone a heads up so no one freaks out when they see that the rules have been changed. The revised forum rules have been up for a month now, and both Haru and I are considering putting these updated rules into effect sometime tomorrow when we have the time to update the rules of the forum. So if anyone else wants to say anything about any of the changes, please do so today since like I said, we'll probably be updating them tomorrow.
|
|
Haru'Shimo
- Otherkin - Mythical Beast
Mythical Beast Winged Kirin
"The world as you know it barely exists, for you know next to nothing about it."
Posts: 608
|
Post by Haru'Shimo on Jul 13, 2014 23:10:14 GMT
Alrighty. Discussion locked, and I'll start making the adjustments discussed here. Soon as I'm done, the rules page will be updated, and we'll start working on the site format adjustments mentioned in the draft, though those will take some time. Luckily I've got a mock-up of the forum for testing now rather than experimenting with this site directly.
Onward and upward!
|
|